The mm Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the mm Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The mm and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out moreCreate an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View mm content recommended for you
On July 31, 2020, positive results from the phase III APOLLO study (MMY3013; NCT03180736) were reported for daratumumab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone (Pd) versus Pd alone in the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma, who have previously been treated with an immunomodulatory drug (lenalidomide) and a proteasome inhibitor. The study met its primary endpoint of improving progression-free survival (PFS).1
This multicenter trial randomized 304 patients to receive either a subcutaneous formulation of daratumumab plus Pd versus Pd alone. The APOLLO trial was designed to confirm the results from the phase I EQUULEUS (MMY1001) study, that assessed intravenous daratumumab plus Pd in the same setting, which led to a U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of the combination.
Overall, the triplet combination of subcutaneous daratumumab plus Pd was consistent with the safety profiles of each individual therapy alone.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content