TRANSLATE

The mm Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the mm Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The mm and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

European Commission approves cilta-cel for the treatment of RRMM after ≥1 prior LOT

By Jennifer Reilly

Share:

Apr 29, 2024

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in relapsed/refractory MM


On April 22, 2024, the European Commission granted approval to ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) for the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) after one or more prior therapies, including an immunomodulatory agent (IMiD) or proteasome inhibitor (PI), who are lenalidomide-refractory with disease progression on the last therapy.1

The approval of this new indication for cilta-cel is based on data from the phase III CARTITUDE-4 trial (NCT04181827) in which patients with RRMM and 13 prior lines of therapy were randomized to  receive either cilta-cel or a standard of care (SOC) regimen, consisting of daratumumab, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone (DPd) or pomalidomide, bortezomib and dexamethasone (PVd).1

CARTITUDE-4 pivotal data

  • A total of 419 patients were randomized to the cilta-cel (n = 208) or SoC arm (n = 211)
  • The overall response rate (ORR) was significantly higher in the cilta-cel arm compared with SoC (Figure 1).2
  • Treatment with cilta-cel resulted in a significantly decreased risk of disease progression or death versus the SoC arm at a hazard ratio of 0.26 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.20.4).
  • Median progression-free survival was not reached in the cilta-cel arm vs 11.8 months in the SoC arm.1
  • The 12-month progression-free survival rate was 76% in the cilta-cel arm versus 49% in the SoC arm.1
  • The most common adverse events were hematologic, with neutropenia being most frequent Grade 3/4 adverse event in both cohorts (Table 1).1

Figure 1. Response data from CARTITUDE-4* 

Cilta-cel, ciltacabtagene autoleucel; CR, complete response; ORR, overall response rate; PR, partial response; sCR, stringent complete response; SoC, standard of care; VGPR, very good partial response.
*Data from European Medicines Agency.2

Table 1. Adverse events of interest*

AE, adverse event; cilta-cel, ciltacabtagene autoleucel; CRS, cytokine release syndrome; SoC, standard of care.
*Data from San-Miguel, et al.3

Adverse events, %

Cilta-cel
(n = 208)

SoC
(n = 208)

Grade 3/4 neutropenia

90

82

Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia

41

19

Grade 3/4 anemia

36

14

Serious AEs

44

39

Infection

62

71

CRS

76

-

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content